New Ladder
1 Dan Hyer
2 Rich Lau
3 Jon Jacob (1 - 0)
4 Dan Hua (0 - 1 )
5 Michael Fiala
6 Jem Lechner
7 Chris Shaffer (1 - 1)
8 Matty Totonchy (1 - 1)
9 Tripp Ritter
10 James Nye
11 Jermey Antley
12 Dave Letzner
13 David Thompson
News and Challenges
The big news is that Chris Shaffer and Matty Totonchy played a double header yesterday. Matty smoked Chris in the first game, as I expected him too. Not because Chris is bad, but Matty is that good. For those who don't know, Matty has only lost once previously and that was to some guy in Florida because of a Wargames. (Matty plays on a regular basis, so his record is impressive.)
I checked up on them to find they had already started their second game. This was at the Lucky Lab on Hawthorne. It was loud and rambunctious as usually. Kids running around the tables, yet there they were playing another game of TS. When all of a sudden.... BOOM! Pieces go flying everywhere. One of the little kids ran into the tray that holds the pieces and they went EVERYWHERE. I am thinking this disrupted Matty (it was his copy), because he went on to the lose to Chris, who was playing the USSR. Apparently, Chris racked up the points early and was able to get an auto-victory during the mid-war. Good job Chris. So, he regained his #7 spot. Matty moves up to #8 since he had moved into #7 with the the first game's win, but then drops a slot to #8 after suffering the loss.
In other news, we have three challenges, which need arrangements:
- Matty (8) challenges Jem Lechner (6) to a match.
- James Nye (10) challenge Tripp Ritter (9).
- Chris Shaffer (7) challenged Michael Fiala
Arrangements need to be made within a week. Use the mail list to announce time, date, and place, but please make your plans off-list.
Also, Jon (3) has challenged Rich Lau (2) to a match. We have already made arrangements to play on the 24th since Rich is out of town.
Not sure this is clear, arrangements for a match, once accepted, need to be made within a week of the challenge. You need to set the time and date within a week, not play within a week. Play must take place within a timely fashion. I know people's schedules can be tight, so I don't want things to get bogged down because of it. Also, I would rather not have challenges missed just because a time and place could not be made within a week. As long as there is an arrangement within a week to play, its fine. You still need to actually play three matches with three months, so arranging something within a week that plays in a month may jeopardize your position on the ladder. (Remember, if you have have a challenge in the works, then you are frozen from other challenges.) Basically, I want to keep this loose and trust that everyone will have good judgment and play fair with the time constraints.
I would think it would be best to contact the person you are thinking of challenging and seeing what their schedule is. This may save a lot of grief.
And finally, we have a new addition to the ladder. David Thompson asked to be added to the group. Welcome, David.